Right enough. And it's always "a car" that loses control, or mounts the pavement. Never "a driver".jmaccyd said:It always interests me the language the media use when describing cycling incidents. So collisions are 'accidents', cyclists are 'in collision' with a car are the worst examples, so the press call this event, a mass ride for a cancer charity, a 'race'! I suppose it is one way of undermining support from the general public. Fairly sad, pathetic actions really but something I have come to expect from the UK now officially the angriest people in Europe.
furball said:A local who was interviewed by Radio Scotland was almost defending this action. It seems the event isn't popular with locals because it restricts access to places on the route.
Jake said:RESULT
Arrest over cycle race sabotage
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/8057084.stm
Arch said:Now then, suitable punishments?
I reckon lock him in a big room with a load of cyclists, each armed with a pump.
Or tie him to a post, and chuck tacks at him...
I notice that one of the gripes of the local action group was that people couldn't get to church. I don't think much of the faith of anyone who can't practise it at home on their own once in a while if need be. And I'm sticking my neck out here, but I reckon Jesus would have said the same...
bonj said:isn't there some ancient rule that you're not allowed to drive to church?
Arch said:I notice that one of the gripes of the local action group was that people couldn't get to church.