I think the thing that jars is that Jonas has form for this, when he followed Remco and Pog in the TDF stage to Troyes in 2024.
It's everything that the anti-Sky detractors complained about, conservative racing that somewhat dulls the spectacle.
Would those defending Jonas' tactics also complain if Ineos towed the bunch in for a Godon "bunch sprint" win?
I'll accept some criticism of Jonas here if someone can explain to me
what Remco was trying to do yesterday and
why? Both Red Biúll and Visma had plenty of domestiques in the front group when he attacked with nearly 30km to go. They could have absolutely buried Almeida in the second group, ended his race bar a Hail Mary. Instead Almeida came back and they gained nothing. Even if Jonas had cooperated they'd have only gained a handful of seconds in the end, max 30, instead of the minute or two they could have had. Not sure why Remco should be mad at Jonas, it should be the other way round really.
Incidentally, the pothole that is supposed to have caused Remco to crash seems to be little more than a small crack in the road (though JOnas says he saw it, the photo I've seen doesn't show anything a GB council would have considered a hole), so the explanation doing the rounds now is basically a handling error caused by massive loss of head.
The idea that Jonas should have worked on the gravel of Troyes is also faintly ridiculous. It's absolutely not his terrain, the attack wasn't his project, working would have been daft, a waste of energy that would have made him even more vulnerable to a mechanical. It's fine for Remco to want to race that, Unlike Jonas he was never trying to beat Pogacar - a project over three weeks.
If Ineos had come back for a bunch sprint that's fine, that's racing.