- Location
- London
The too too refined art of passive aggressive affected offended victim mode (on behalf of any group that can be used for the perpetrator's individual ego purposes) bullying.
But the title of the thread is - 'What art would you remove from the world?'The game is
What cultural artefact would you remove from the world?
"I would remove the work of Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst" would be clearer.But the title of the thread is - 'What art would you remove from the world?'
I would remove Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst; ipso facto, remove their 'art'.
Park Life!The too too refined art of passive aggressive affected offended victim mode (on behalf of any group that can be used for the perpetrator's individual ego purposes) bullying.
Nah! I'd scrub the pair of 'em! Talentless con artists."I would remove the work of Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst" would be clearer.
Nah! I'd scrub the pair of 'em! Talentless con artists.![]()
Best one I've ever read!That reminds me. Haiku poetry, over-rated nonsense, it has got to go.
If there is a plot, it needs replanting.I read that as remove the sub titles, and found myself in agreement. Understanding the plot ruins it for me.
I agree, the only way to fully appreciate opera is to see it live.Opera. Remove the subsidies, remove it from public broadcasting.
East-Enders, the TV series not the lovable cockneys (although on 2nd thoughts they can go as well)
(I may have worked in that there Landun a fair bit)
Australia... but Barry Humphries and Midnight Oil can stay.
I would remove that hideous, vulgar chocolate brown statue from St Pancras:
I tried to change the title to completely explain it, but it turns out it's only 100 characters allowed, and not all ideas can be unambiguously expressed in 100 characters.But the title of the thread is - 'What art would you remove from the world?'
I would remove Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst; ipso facto, remove their 'art'.