swansonj
Guru
A British (men's) winner at Wimbledon is wonderful - but actually, 77 years without one must be a serious underperformance for a country of our size and resources.
A British winner of the TdF last year was wonderful - but actually, never having had one before must class as a serious underperformance.
Britain has ten Formula One world champions out of 32, and even allowing for the skewing of Motorsport to affluent countries and the insularity of the USA, I'm going to guess that must be a statistical over-performance.
There aren't many other sports I know enough about, but I'll guess that in athletics we're closer to average allowing for population and affluence, and I'll guess that not having won a four- yearly event since 1966 is not yet particularly aberrant?
A British winner of the TdF last year was wonderful - but actually, never having had one before must class as a serious underperformance.
Britain has ten Formula One world champions out of 32, and even allowing for the skewing of Motorsport to affluent countries and the insularity of the USA, I'm going to guess that must be a statistical over-performance.
There aren't many other sports I know enough about, but I'll guess that in athletics we're closer to average allowing for population and affluence, and I'll guess that not having won a four- yearly event since 1966 is not yet particularly aberrant?