Why is Surrey so popular with cyclists?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Globalti

Legendary Member
My big prejudice would be that it's in the South and therefore crowded and the roads not cycle friendly.

I can't imagine anywhere that's better than Lancashire; on the west of the county we've got the flat coastal plains and great riding all the way up to the South Lakes. In the middle we've got the Bowland Fells, the West Pennines, the Pennines proper, the beginning of the Yorkshire Dales and in the middle the Ribble Valley, all quiet traffic free areas with pretty villages and plenty of great cafes.

So go on, give me a geography lesson, tell me why Surrey has always held such an allure for cyclists.
 

Fnaar

Smutmaster General
Location
Thumberland
I've got some rellies there... there are some cracking hills and surprisingly quiet lanes.
 

martint235

Dog on a bike
Location
Welling
Coming from Pendle, I have to say you can't beat the Pennines and the Ribble Valley but Surrey and Kent (where I now live) have some really good hills and quiet lanes not much more than an hour from central London
 

Norm

Guest
I'd agree with what I think Martin is saying. Surrey has some fantastic roads (which might also be true of other parts of the world) and Surrey is within a short ride / train hop from the homes of a lot of people (which is not true of some other parts of the world).

However, I'm wondering what it is that makes you think that Surrey is popular? I've ridden in / round / through it quite a few times and the bloody place is far too lumpy for my liking. :biggrin:
 

ttcycle

Cycling Excusiast
It's also a lot to do with economics - South/North divide with vast ranging variances in incomes- Surrey is the home to many of the well off commuter belt who can afford the gear - a typical MAMIL type. Surrey therefore is a natural roaming ground for those in that sense.

That and what Martin mentioned re distances to London, which has loads of people that cycle in general.
 

slowmotion

Quite dreadful
Location
lost somewhere
People keep telling me to practice on "The Surrey Hills". The very mention of them turns my tripes to water. BTW, where are they? One day I will pluck up courage.
 

Fnaar

Smutmaster General
Location
Thumberland
Bonj? Blimey! Hello there.
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
My big prejudice would be that it's in the South and therefore crowded and the roads not cycle friendly.

I can't imagine anywhere that's better than Lancashire; on the west of the county we've got the flat coastal plains and great riding all the way up to the South Lakes. In the middle we've got the Bowland Fells, the West Pennines, the Pennines proper, the beginning of the Yorkshire Dales and in the middle the Ribble Valley, all quiet traffic free areas with pretty villages and plenty of great cafes.

So go on, give me a geography lesson, tell me why Surrey has always held such an allure for cyclists.

I'm from Lancashire and live in Surrey.

I never cycled in Lancashire (being a late comer to cycling) but do 5,000 plus recreational miles a year in Surrey (extending into Sussex, Kent & Berkshire ie about the same geographical spread as lancashire) - mainly on quiet traffic free roads or an amazing network of bridleways, tracks and tow path (about a 70/30 split between road and MTB).

I can ride almost from my door off road as far as the south coast (60 miles) with no more than a few linking miles of road. The other day i rode from Merton to Hedgerley near Gerard's Cross - 56 miles 40 plus off road. I've just plotted a day ride that will take me 4 miles on road then off road cross coutry to pick up the wey navigation, thence to Guildford, up onto the North Downs, along the old Drovers Road along Ranmore, past Polsden Lacy to Leatherhead, off road over Epsom Downs and back onto the road for 4 miles home. 60ish miles with 3000 feet of climbing mostly in the last 30 miles - a route i was taken on one day a year or so ago.

I totted up the other day, since starting cycling seriously 3/4 years ago, i have been on 375 rides in Surrey and neighbouring counties. More than 250 of those have been distinct routes with a variety of different groups with most of the others being local family or training rides along the towpath or round richmond park. A pretty high proportion of those 250 distinct rides have been to different pub or cafe stops.

When i go out on the bike i have a choice between the flat lands of the Thames Valley, the challenging hills of the Surrey Hills, or the rolling countryside of any of the counties mentioned.

Plus, of course it is warmer, it is drier, there are fewer snowy/frosty days than much of Lancashire!

I'm pretty sure i could go back to Lancashire and find the same range of riding, so I'm not saying Surrey is better, just that it does offer fantastic cycling!
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
A lot of people live in Surrey, but it's still not quite as crowded as London. It was pretty once, and people think it still is. It's got one famous hill which everyone's heard of. If you're starting in London it's easier to go South West along the Thames (because it's flat) than in any other direction. It has a few train lines, so if you're starting to collapse you can get home easily.

All of which means that people don't investigate the other areas around London, so they stay quieter. Which suits me just fine.
 

asterix

Comrade Member
Location
Limoges or York
Donkey's years ago I lived in Leatherhead. It was the countryside round there that got me cycling. A few years ago I went back for some reason and literally didn't recognise the place!

We had a lovely garden and according to Google earth they now have built 2 blocks of flats in it! I couldn't bear to go back and look!
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
That's happened with two houses I lived in as a kid; horrible isn't it!

It's better than building a block of flats in the countryside, or allowing yet more Barrett-box suburban sprawl.
 
Top Bottom