cyberknight
As long as I breathe, I attack.
- Location
- Land of confusion
Personally i don't think its right to force employers to do this. If you refused to do overtime and your employer sacked you surely you would be able to take them to tribunal bcoz you are only contracted for, say, 40 hours per week. So how can you then say it works the other way? No one is obliged to do overtime bcoz by definition, it's time worked over and above your contracted hours ?? I've mostly worked in offices, so always been salaried, but I've also worked in a well known supermarket where overtime was offered but the company never had a right to make me work and couldn't sack me if I didn't. Surely that applies everywhere? Or am I wrong?
Unfortunately although you have a basic pay, my contract states that you work till your done whether it be zero or 3 hours which as stated only gets announced about 1 hour before official clocking off time .Best case scenario is planned production finish time ranging from zero to 1 hour overtime plus around half an hour on top to leave the job in a good condition for the next shift .Even with planned zero overtime last month i still did 25 hours over time .
I have heard this 3 month figure banded about ,nothing definite.AS I understand holiday pay entitlement (it's been a while since did payroll at college), statutory holiday pay is 5.6 weeks, up to a maximum of 28 days. A week of holiday pay is an average of the last 12 weeks wages (from the government's website, excluding non-guaranteed overtime). I think the union has argued that overtime should be included in the calculation of the 12-week average if you regularly work overtime. How this will work regarding back-dated pay, and like @cyberknight at Toymota, where overtime can vary, but you're contracted to do it if it's called, I don't know.