Crankarm said:Are you just being provocative for the sake of it? Black/white, white/black ? This isn't the cyclists cycling without lights thread on which I seem to remember your posts were equally provocative IIRC .
What, where I said that if cyclists without lights are still visible, it ain't that big a deal to me? If thats provocative, you're just too easy to provoke.
There was nothing wrong with my road positioning.
Yes there was. You were doing 25mph on a narrow section of road where the speed limit was 30, where there was no room to overtake you safely, in a position more timid than secondary. Thats bad positioning, your location on the road invites a dangerous overtake, you should almost invariably in such circumstances take primary position.
I am a seasoned experienced road cyclist.
Yeah, so you say. Yet, did you not say recently that motorists seem to risk your life on a near daily basis?
The picture I'm getting of your cycling is one of physical competence (thats a good speed to be doing on the flat!) but perhaps poor thinking (there is no excuse for that speed in the gutter. Seasoned and experienced? Maybe, but yours are perhaps the most regularly negative experiences I encounter on these pages.
Tell me (I lost track of your post at this point I'm afraid, it stopped being a coherent point and became more of a strange stream of consciousness), why were you not in primary? Why does a requirement for good roadcraft apply to everyone but you?