What would actually benefit the game in Scotland (and most other countries) would be a fairer distribution of revenues to create more a more competitive league, rather than a minority hoovering up all the cash, spunking it on big names who rarely deliver and poaching the talent from other sides only to ruin them.
I agree , a two horse race is not very exciting , the trouble is there is not much money in the Scottish game to distribute .
"Everyone, not only Rangers fans, should be happy with that. Scottish football needs a healthy Rangers, a strong, robust Rangers championing our game at home and abroad."
Two horse race better than a one horse canter.
Bring back the early '80's
Do they not get a government subsidy/tax break for taking on someone unemployed?Stuart McCall to be appointed manager til the end of the season (when I presume he will also walk away like Super Ally and Awful McDowall several quids richer)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/31839589
Stuart returned to his beloved Bantams and with 15000 fans right behind him, took us to 10th in the basement division. The following season he assembled an expensive squad, with the divisions biggest budget and promised us back-to-back promotions, he took us to 10th in the basement division. The season after saw us improve to 14th...............then he went totally crackers.....They should get some sort of subsidy/tax break. There can't be many football clubs who are paying the wages of THREE managers!Do they not get a government subsidy/tax break for taking on someone unemployed?