105 v Ultegra Cassette

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

2Jags

New Member
Location
Stoke on Trent
My new Cube Agree should arrive at my LBS any day now. It is a Compact, no triples available, with ultegra kit that comes with the stock 12-25 cassette but I have asked that the shop swap out the cassette for one with 27 or 28 teeth to give me a lower gear for climbing/duff knees.

LBS say they can only get a 105 12-27 cassette but the difference with this and ultegra is negligible.

Is there much difference and could this lead to any compatibility problems? Should I stick with the stock 12-25, see how I go and then swap out later if I struggle with this set up?

Any advice would be welcome.
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
My new Cube Agree should arrive at my LBS any day now. It is a Compact, no triples available, with ultegra kit that comes with the stock 12-25 cassette but I have asked that the shop swap out the cassette for one with 27 or 28 teeth to give me a lower gear for climbing/duff knees.

LBS say they can only get a 105 12-27 cassette but the difference with this and ultegra is negligible.

Is there much difference and could this lead to any compatibility problems? Should I stick with the stock 12-25, see how I go and then swap out later if I struggle with this set up?

Any advice would be welcome.

New 105 has a very good reputation. I'd go with it if you need the extra gears as I'm certain you wouldn't be able to detect the difference.
 

gavintc

Guru
Location
Southsea
I bought a cassette manufactured by BBB as a cost saving measure recently for my commute bike and had a devil's job getting the gears balanced and working smoothly. Eventually, I took the bike to the LBS and he too admitted to having some problems. He then swapped the cassette for a 105 one and it worked fine. My conclusion - use Shimano cassettes. I discussed with the LBS whether there was much difference between Ultegra and 105. He reckoned not much, but it would change a little bit smoother.
 

Banjo

Fuelled with Jelly Babies
Location
South Wales
New 105 has a very good reputation. I'd go with it if you need the extra gears as I'm certain you wouldn't be able to detect the difference.

I have had 10 speed Ultegra and now 10 speed 105 both are smooth and slick changing. 105 will be fine.
 

e-rider

crappy member
Location
South West
more importantly --- if you have a compact chainset (34/50) and a short cage rear mech; the max .sprocket you can use at the back is 25 (NOT 27).

To use a 27 you need to either get a long cage rear mech or change the 34 chainring to a 39 (which is pointless as you were trying to get a lower gear)

If you already have a long cage rear mech you'll be fine.

I use 105 and it works fine - I'm guessing that the ultegra will be slightly lighter but with no difference in performance
 

threebikesmcginty

Corn Fed Hick...
Location
...on the slake
My road bike came with a 105 12-25 and I recently changed it to an Ultegra 12-27. I went to Ultegra because the rest of the groupset was apart from the cassette. I'm not sure if I notice the difference as far as the groupset goes but those extra couple of teeth are welcome on a steep hill. I got a deal at the time on a 6600 from Ribble - as always very quick service!
 

Crimmey

Well-Known Member
Location
Middleton
In reply to TUndragumski, the new Shimano systems allow a chain wrap of 33t and not the previous limit of 29t. Also can officially now accommodate a small cog of 28t. 12-27 on a compact with Ultegra 6700 derailleurs is fine.

In regards the cassettes, you will not notice any performance difference. Get the 105 12-27 cassette.
 
Slightly OT, My Kinesis is fitted with a 105 38/52 (12-25) at the moment, this thread got me looking at things and I'm tempted by a SRAM cassette, they do a 10sp 11-26. I have a 8spd 11-26 cassette on my Sirrus at the moment and I like the range it gives me without having to drop chainrings :smile:

Wrt the original post i can't recall what the weight difference is between 105 and Ultegra but I seriously doubt it would be noticed and as the 105 does the gearing you want go for it :smile:
 
I also considered what would be required for lower gearing, coming from an mtb with 28-32 min. gearing to a 34-25 road bike. It is (only) Tiagra, btu Shimano say a 27tooth cassette is the largest sprocket, not the 25.

Regardless of this, I have been amazed that the road bike can get up climbs even more easily than the much lower geared (but heavier) bike can anyway, so I am sticking with 25t.
 

gavintc

Guru
Location
Southsea
more importantly --- if you have a compact chainset (34/50) and a short cage rear mech; the max .sprocket you can use at the back is 25 (NOT 27).

To use a 27 you need to either get a long cage rear mech or change the 34 chainring to a 39 (which is pointless as you were trying to get a lower gear)

If you already have a long cage rear mech you'll be fine.

I use 105 and it works fine - I'm guessing that the ultegra will be slightly lighter but with no difference in performance

Not quite true. I have compact chainset and a couple of years ago wanted to tackle Mt Ventoux, so asked the local shop if I could fit a 12-27 cassette. The answer was Yes, but definitely avoid using the largest 2-3 cogs with the 50 ring. I used the cassette for the holiday and had no problems. On return, I refitted the 12-25. I concede that I did not run the cassette on the bike for a long period, but think I will have put about 600km on it. So, it does work.
 

e-rider

crappy member
Location
South West
Not quite true. I have compact chainset and a couple of years ago wanted to tackle Mt Ventoux, so asked the local shop if I could fit a 12-27 cassette. The answer was Yes, but definitely avoid using the largest 2-3 cogs with the 50 ring. I used the cassette for the holiday and had no problems. On return, I refitted the 12-25. I concede that I did not run the cassette on the bike for a long period, but think I will have put about 600km on it. So, it does work.

yes and the reason you couldn't use the largest cogs was due to chain length - it had to be short because the short cage rear mech couldn't take up the slack if it was any longer - so you can use a 27 with a 34t chainring and short cage rear mech but it's not ideal whereas by either fitting a long cage rear mech or sticking with a 25t max sprocket everything works just how it should
 

HJ

Cycling in Scotland
Location
Auld Reekie
Slightly OT, My Kinesis is fitted with a 105 38/52 (12-25) at the moment, this thread got me looking at things and I'm tempted by a SRAM cassette, they do a 10sp 11-26. I have a 8spd 11-26 cassette on my Sirrus at the moment and I like the range it gives me without having to drop chainrings :smile:

Wrt the original post i can't recall what the weight difference is between 105 and Ultegra but I seriously doubt it would be noticed and as the 105 does the gearing you want go for it :smile:

According to Weight Weenies it is 10g for the 12-25 10 speed.
 

e-rider

crappy member
Location
South West
Ultegra chains are nice and silver whereas the 105 is grey - that's must be worth an upgrade just for the silver bling look!
 

Soltydog

Legendary Member
Location
near Hornsea
I have a spesh Allez Elite & it came with shimano 105, 27t largest sprocket & 53/39t chainrings. AFAIK the rear mech is a short cage (but maybe medium:wacko:) & all works fine
 
Top Bottom