thom
____
- Location
- The Borough
because 7, 8, 9 ?Why was 6 afraid of 7?
because 7, 8, 9 ?Why was 6 afraid of 7?
No.because 7, 8, 9 ?
I'm surprised @fnaar didn't get the 59009 pun - maybe he never used a calculatorNo.
Because it was a scary film.
[you're right of course]
Just got itI'm surprised @fnaar didn't get the 59009 pun - maybe he never used a calculator
I'm surprised @fnaar didn't get the 59009 pun - maybe he never used a calculator
Is there any significant compression when you coil it around? Also it would help if you knew the width of the foil or even the total number of times it is wound round.
The outer circumference is 2πr = 2 x π x 120mm which is about 754mm.
The inner circumference is rather similar and 2 x π x 25mm which is about 157mm.
You could get a crude approximation by using an arithmetic progression.
We know the total length is 25,000mm. We know the first term is 157mm and the last term is 754mm
S_n = (n/2) (a_1 + a_n)
25,000 = (n/2) (157+754)
50,000 = 911n
n=54.9 coils, call it 55. And this would mean each rotation added about 3.45-3.5mm to the thickness.
It is obviously somewhere between 33 coils and 159 coils.
Again you'd then feed it back into the arithmetic progression.
a_n = a_1 + (n-1)d and so on.
a_2 = 157 + (2-1)d
Otherwise you could use an Archimedean spiral with the above information I guess
r = a + bθ and we have b from earlier
Anywho, sorry quite busy. Sure someone else will think of something better.
In which case it's not foil.And this would mean each rotation added about 3.45-3.5mm to the thickness.