Usually to be 80p poorer every time I go to the cinema...
...And my glovebox getting a little bit fuller with yet another pair of flamin' 3d glasses...
£1 in Leicester square odeon. Never again, specially on a Friday night
[QUOTE 2760724, member: 259"]My perception of 3D from movie screens and TVs is very poor, as I'm red/green colourblind. Everyone else in the family seems to think 3D TV is worth it though.[/quote]
i don't know about tv but the new cinema 3d doesn't seem to work on the red/green thing anymore. Some other kind of magic.
Gravity is the first film Mark Kermode (Radio 5Live Film critic and noted 3D sceptic) has recommended to see in 3D rather than 2D. So Gravity may not be the best judge for the OP as a bar for all 3D films. For me most 3D films I've seen haven't really impressed me, after 20 minutes I stop noticing the effect and instead get annoyed about wearing the glasses. I am going to see Gravity on Tuesday in IMax 3D so will be interesting if its use of 3D is immersive as the critics say.
It was listening to Kermode on 3d that put me off the idea for so long. Interesting he thought it added something with Gravity.
3D all depends on the content and the type of 3D.
Many 3D films are conversions and were NOT filmed in 3D.
Titianic or Avatar are considered some of the best 3D blurays to view, especially on an ACTIVE TV. None of this Passive malarky
I watched Thor 3D last night using active 3D. This was a conversion and not too much 3D going on but it does add some dimension to the film.
Interesting. I wonder if the Hobbit is converted. As I mentioned the trailer was on before Gravity and the characters were like cardboard cut outs in front of a flat background. Pretty bad.