Andrew_Culture
Internet Marketing bod
- Location
- The People's Republic Of Suffolk.
I should get a picture of my SS crankset that came on my Trek, it's actually a double 130mm with a chain guard on the outer.
I'd love to see what that looks like.
I should get a picture of my SS crankset that came on my Trek, it's actually a double 130mm with a chain guard on the outer.
I've never quite gotten my head around ratios, so I need a little help.
My winter hack / commuter / single speed is currently running 52t on the front and 17t on the back 16t in the summer) and the ratio suits me just fine. The 52t front crank is very old and not only has shark finning on the teeth, some of the teeth are so worn that it looks like they've melted.
I can't replace just the chainring because it's an obsolete crank so I figure I'll just replace the crank and the chainring. When I look around the web I see plenty of singlespeed / fixie crank and chainring sets but most seem to be 42t or 44t. So if I got 44t what would I need to change the back to?
Can I buy a standard front crank and then buy a chainring of my choice? Do spacers for front cranks exist?
This is not a pretty bike (but I love it) so I'm fairly open to any suggestions.
You need to look in the right place .... Plenty of 48's here http://velosolo.co.uk/shopcrank.html
These are decent cranks at an attractive price: http://www.spacycles.co.uk/products.php?plid=m2b0s109p2003
Fit a ring of your choice.
Those are damn big gears you are all riding there, I would be walking up a lot of hills with that ratio on my bike. You make me feel weak.
I've never quite gotten my head around ratios, so I need a little help.
Tests in the 1990s showed that using a larger front chainring was slightly more efficient, than a smaller one (for the same size gear) - also, larger rear sprockets are more tolerant of a chainline that isn't 100% straight.
Two reasons you should stick to a larger front ring and larger sprocket, rather than changing to 42x14 or similar
the downside is that 'going large' means more weight
That's what I was thinking, 85" is old school TT style gearing. I run 44 x 16 (72"'ish) and I'm on the limit on steep hills.Those are damn big gears you are all riding there, I would be walking up a lot of hills with that ratio on my bike. You make me feel weak.