No, I'm talking about what you refer to as permanence (birth family vs social services). In the case I previously described, social services effectively lost the case they put before the court. Maybe this was a rare occurence, but it seems foolish to match children with adoptive parents before the court has ruled, even if social services are expecting to get rubber stamped in the majority of cases.
Apologies if you find my account unsettling to your own situation. I'm just presenting the view from the other side, which isn't often heard, due to privacy issues, reporting restrictions, because the majority of parents do not experience it, and social services don't want a light shone into what can be a murky area of justice that is sometimes likened to a kangaroo court. Feel free to tell me to get lost if you don't like what I'm saying and/or think it's unhelpful.