I assume they are heavier? do they have tougher frames with thicker metal? or stronger wheels?
Would they survive pot-holes/rough tracks better? why?
Cheers
Digit
Most of the high-end ones have rack-compatible rear brake mounts, but no rack eyelets. They are sub-touring bikes for adventures of a lesser kind.
The Spa Adventure (which I'm still thinking about) has more bosses, eyelets and water bottle mounts than you could shake a stick at.
How is it that one-man band touring specialists such as SPA have a better understanding of how expedition riders use bikes, than major brands such as Specialized, BMC, GT?
I'm interested in maybe getting one of these adventure/gravel bikes. My mtb is about dead and I need a road bike with gears (single speed is killing knees) and possibly a bike that can handle the road and offroad better than a cx bike may be useful. Possibly even enabling n-1.
So far I like this
...the Slate from Cannondale, and this...
from Tomac (on one)
They split the difference between an endurance road bike and a cyclo-cross bike, with space for bigger tyres than an endurance bike and geometry better suited to road riding than a cyclo-cross bike.
It's just the marketing men selling another worthless dream ....