Night Train said:
It is hard work keeping a look out for them and everything else on the road. So I slow down more.
Bing!
This is what I was taught to do on my test. Why is it so unusual to hear someone express that?
I wince when I see people doing 30 on residential roads with parked cars either side. Could they stop if a kid ran out from between them? Not in time, I suspect, so I take these slow - I'd rather do that than be bleating "He just came from nowhere..!" if I did hit someone.
Where road conditions can change abruptly (e.g. driving the lanes locally) I SLOW DOWN. Where there's peds about, or cyclists, or horses, or milk tankers, or cows (lots of dairly farming round my way) I SLOW DOWN.
It isn't rocket science. You should have been taught it on your test.
Mr Pig is right to point out that we live in a f*cked up country. Years of focussing road safety effort on getting everything else out of the way of cars have bred the idea that it's ok for the most dangerous road users to totally abdicate their responsibilities to everyone else, with the enforcement of traffic law colluding in this shameful drift towards the mess we have now. As the recent NAO study pointed out, the roads of Britain are pretty safe, provided you travel them in a car. As a cyclist, pedestrian or motorcyclist, they're more dangerous altogether, particularly, and shamefully so if you're a young pedestrian.
As I've said before, I saw a little lad in our local chippy last year who'd been togged up in a hi-viz vest to walk there with his mum, presumably because the local motons can't be relied on to slow down when it's dark out, and keep a closer eye out for pedestrians.