Don't listen to the fashion brigade Flanker.
Personally I find that I see bright blue better in nearly all light conditions, but that may be just my eyesight.
The seeing bit (as in sufficient photons bouncing off cyclist and entering driver's eyes) isn't all of the story though. Although it's a bit worn now, those TFL vids of the dancing bear show how much processing the driver's brain has to do before the driver really sees a cyclist.
With your figure!
I'd steer you towards summer neutrals - a taupe, brushed fawn or deep muffin perhaps?
do you manage to shoehorn in 'deep muffin' often or is it saved for special occasions?
To link this with hippo's recent pronouncements, do you think you can get hi-viz burberry?
Speshly for you!
I'm feelin the love
I do. I use all the aids available. Hence I seldom have incidents with motorists and hence I don't need to wear a camera to record them.
Some drivers will not see you what ever aids are being used. I once saw a car overtake the Prime Ministers motorcade despite lots of blue flashing lights and an large flashing illuminated sign on the last vehicle stating "POLICE - DO NOT OVERTAKE".Anecdote is not data, but I've been hit in twilight by a car whilst wearing Hi-Viz & running 3 (3!) lights front and back of the bike. "I thought you'd left the roundabout!"
I've been hit by a bus in broad daylight whilst running a flashing light front & back & wearing Hi-viz.
It can help in some conditions, but for god's sake don't assume drivers are paying enough attention to notice it, or that they'll not take a too close overtake.
Anyway - can't we all just agree that - like helmets - wearing or not wearing Hi-Viz is a personal choice and leave it at that? The OP was merely mentioning a cheap source of a Hi-Viz jersey, not telling any of you that you had to wear one!