Clearly not. The report of the 2009 incident, for instance, makes it fairly clear he wasn't in any way at fault - a cyclist rides across a crossing so suddenly that oncoming traffic has to brake to avoid him. No injury and no-one prosecuted.I didn't research them.
I didn't research them, I just lazily copied and pasted them from another forum where somebody else thinks Amir Khan is a waste of space.
This incident wasn't exactly impressive though...Clearly not. The report of the 2009 incident, for instance, makes it fairly clear he wasn't in any way at fault - a cyclist rides across a crossing so suddenly that oncoming traffic has to brake to avoid him. No injury and no-one prosecuted.
The Bolton News said:The accident happened on March 2, 2006, as foundry worker Mr Hatton was crossing Bradshawgate in Bolton town centre on his way from work to the Balmoral pub.
A court was told that the boxer sped along the road in his high-powered BMW 6 Series convertible at speeds of up to 47mph. He swerved round cars which had stopped for a red light, hitting Mr Hatton on a pelican crossing.
Mr Hatton's right leg was detached from his hip in the accident and he was left with a metal rod and pins in his leg.
In October last year Khan was found guilty at Bolton Crown Court of driving without due care and attention. He was fined £1,000 and banned from driving for six months.
Khan should have been more careful. It behoves people who drive cars to take care at zebra crossings. And as for the other one........Clearly not. The report of the 2009 incident, for instance, makes it fairly clear he wasn't in any way at fault - a cyclist rides across a crossing so suddenly that oncoming traffic has to brake to avoid him. No injury and no-one prosecuted.
Look, we can agree to disagree. In my view he's a little shoot.
TBH I can't see that he did anything wrong - but the previous incident was a) fairly serious and b) 100% his fault.This incident wasn't exactly impressive though...
I remember seeing him interviewed on the TV and he seemed like a nice young man, and I agree about Hamed, however that doesn't get away from the fact that Khan is a nice young man who evidently drives like an idiot! Give him a lifetime ban and I'd be happy.As testosterone-fuelled sportsmen go, I would put him marginally at the more acceptable end of the scale. He isn't a hero just because he can throw a punch, but he isn't the Spawn of Satan just because he's rich and well known. He doesn't shag around and AFAIK his charity work is genuine.
I would contrast him with Naseem Hamed, who gives the impression of being an arrogant unprincipled hooligan who used to box because he liked hitting people. Not that I've met him either.
He doesn't shag around...
Well there you go. I don't read the Sun; and if I did, I don't think I would believe much of what I saw.“Khan got Amirous with Rooney tart” - a fine headline if ever there was one.