Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
I made it to the end. So e things just aren't funny.
Go to a fake news one and spread your lies there.
I think these two are just scared of injections, something to do with not liking having a small prick...
....In the arm
One time I had a flu jab. Was sick as a dog and off work a week because of it. Never again.
Whatever the rights & wrongs of flu jabs, it seems to me that some of the language being used in this thread is a tad inflammatory for our 'fun and friendly' community. To lie is to say something one knows to be untrue with the intention to mislead. I don't think that applies, in either of these instances. I'm all for preventing/discouraging the spread of (especially potentially dangerous) misinformation, but I would hope that it can be done with courtesy.
Y'know I get the sniffles after my 'flu jab. I know its not a 'live virus' and it's not making me ill but its happened enough times I'm certain it can't be coincidence. I've decided that in all likelihood the jab compromised my immune system just enough to let something else I was harbouring to pounce. I'm quite prepared to be told that's rubbish as its not based on anything other than conjecture and my limited knowledge.
Y'know I get the sniffles after my 'flu jab. I know its not a 'live virus' and it's not making me ill but its happened enough times I'm certain it can't be coincidence. I've decided that in all likelihood the jab compromised my immune system just enough to let something else I was harbouring to pounce. I'm quite prepared to be told that's rubbish as its not based on anything other than conjecture and my limited knowledge.
Its not a coincidence, and its not a dose of flu. Its your immune system being stimulated by the vaccine.
Once bitten twice shy here.Y'know I get the sniffles after my 'flu jab. I know its not a 'live virus' and it's not making me ill but its happened enough times I'm certain it can't be coincidence. I've decided that in all likelihood the jab compromised my immune system just enough to let something else I was harbouring to pounce. I'm quite prepared to be told that's rubbish as its not based on anything other than conjecture and my limited knowledge.
Antivac quackery of the first order
Are you trolling or like Accy simply a gullible fool?
https://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/mercola.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Mercola
Other views
Other controversial views Mercola supports include:
- Dietary recommendations on food consumption that often put him at odds with mainstream dietary advice[13] such as encouraging the ingestion of unprocessed food, including unrefined coconut oil containing saturated fat in place of polyunsaturated fats.
- Advocacy on the labeling and health of genetically modified food.[20][21][22][23][24]
- Claims that microwaving food alters its chemistry, despite consensus that microwaving food does not adversely affect nutrient content compared to conventionally prepared food.[25][26][27][28]
- Opposition of homogenization, claiming it leads to xanthine oxidase absorption and oxidative stress, despite scientists considering the belief "tenuous and implausible",[29] stating "Experimental evidence has failed to substantiate, and in many cases has refuted, the xanthine oxidase/plasmalogen depletion hypothesis."[30]
- Questioning whether HIV is the cause of AIDS, claiming manifestations of AIDS (including opportunistic infections and death) may be the result of "psychological stress" brought on by the belief that HIV is harmful. The scientific community considers the evidence that HIV causes AIDS conclusive.[31][32][33][34] Mercola.com has also featured positive presentations of the claims of AIDS denialists, a fringe group which denies the existence of AIDS and/or the role of HIV in causing it.[1]
- Opposition to U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations, such as the use of most prescription drugs and immunizations for managing illness, and instead recommending consumption of unprocessed organic produce, elimination of most sugar and grains from the diet, removing household toxins from cleaning supplies and cosmetics, and energy psychology tools to address emotional challenges while also selling and promoting numerous dietary supplements.
- Claiming cancer risks arise from mobile phone radiation,[35] which is pseudoscientific.[36]
- Claims that many commercial brands of sunscreen increase, rather than decrease, the likelihood of contracting skin cancer with high UV exposure, and instead advocating the use of natural sunscreens, some of which he markets on his website. This view is not held by mainstream medical science; in 2011, the National Toxicology Program stated that "Protection against photodamage by use of broad-spectrum sunscreens is well-documented as an effective means of reducing total lifetime UV dose and, thereby, preventing or ameliorating the effects of UV radiation on both the appearance and biomechanical properties of the skin."[37]
Sorry not clear. The GP is always desperate to get me in.Can't you book in to a local pharmacist and get it done?
Mod Note:
Wow, for such an innocuous title, this one is developing a high temperature quickly. Can we refrain from getting too personal please, that would be much appreciated for a Sunday afternoon.