Are the flanges on the 2speed Brompton derailleur jockey wheels so the control can behave as if indexed, with pusher simplyresting against flange...?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

SA3BR

Well-Known Member
Are the flanges on the 2speed Brompton derailleur jockey wheels just so the control can behave as if indexed, with chain pusher resting but pressibg against flange in use, whereas no flange would mean an old school friction style shifter where user changes gear and/then adjusts pusher a tad to not rub on chain?.....

In which case if you replaced brompton 2 speed shifter with an old school friction thumb (left)shifter, the crud trapping capabilities of the flanges could be avoided* ?

*presumably you would keep the inside flange on the lower jockey, as the non derailleur tensioner has one there?
 

Fastpedaller

Über Member
The chain pusher touches the flange to move the chain out or in when the shifter is moved in the required direction. It works the same if a friction shifter is used. Without the flanges the chain pusher would be touching the chain and create a terrible din and probably jam with the chain.
 
OP
OP
S

SA3BR

Well-Known Member
The chain pusher touches the flange to move the chain out or in when the shifter is moved in the required direction. It works the same if a friction shifter is used. Without the flanges the chain pusher would be touching the chain and create a terrible din and probably jam with the chain.
Thanks, But normal non folder front derailleurs just directly touch the chain and the osgood super champion rear derailleur also:

View: https://www.flickr.com/photos/speedplaypedals/7373407640/


so I presumed Brompton had a unique reason for adding the flanges..

EDIT upon further though a front derailleur has a parallelogram mechanism so always moves parallel to the chain and the osgood mech has a much longer distance between pivot and 'cage', so is presumably 'near enough parallel' to work?

EDIT I wonder if there is anything that would allow 3 flanges to be dropped .
 
Last edited:

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Thanks, But normal non folder front derailleurs just directly touch the chain and the osgood super champion rear derailleur also:

View: https://www.flickr.com/photos/speedplaypedals/7373407640/


so I presumed Brompton had a unique reason for adding the flanges..

EDIT upon further though a front derailleur has a parallelogram mechanism so always moves parallel to the chain and the osgood mech has a much longer distance between pivot and 'cage', so is presumably 'near enough parallel' to work?

EDIT I wonder if there is anything that would allow 3 flanges to be dropped .


The differentiator is that on a traditional derailleur the force that moves the jockey wheels laterally is transferred from the cage through the jockey wheel bearings. Conversely the jockey wheels on the Brompton are free-floating laterally so the flanges are necessary for the pusher to act upon to move them.

I assume this is because there's insufficient space for a traditional derailleur on account of the small wheels and fold. Ultimately whichever way you go, if you wish to move the chain laterally it's going to involve some sliding friction between components and while a bit weird the Brompton system seems capable enough.
 

rogerzilla

Legendary Member
Brompton derailleurs allow changing (at the lever) while not pedalling because of the springs in the cable run. They presumably wanted to make it idiot-proof. The chain won't actually move sprockets until you pedal, but the gear can be selected even if stationary.
 

Kell

Guru
Are the flanges on the 2speed Brompton derailleur jockey wheels just so the control can behave as if indexed, with chain pusher resting but pressibg against flange in use, whereas no flange would mean an old school friction style shifter where user changes gear and/then adjusts pusher a tad to not rub on chain?.....

In which case if you replaced brompton 2 speed shifter with an old school friction thumb (left)shifter, the crud trapping capabilities of the flanges could be avoided* ?

*presumably you would keep the inside flange on the lower jockey, as the non derailleur tensioner has one there?

My chain pusher actually wore out as it was constantly touching the flanges. I did think it must be possible to set it up with the limit screws so it's not constantly rubbing, but when I tried, I then had difficulty switching gears.
 
Top Bottom