I'm err a cyclist too....having read the first post I realise a bit a self flagellation by way of atonement is required!
I learnt to drive in Cambridge. That was, in itself, something of an eye-opener.
The area around the bus station, grand arcade, lion yard and sidney street can be particularly chaotic.

Grand Arcade and Lion Yard are both pedestrianised so I can see why you found the driving tricky...![]()

Exactly. The problem was passing too close to pedestrians, not crossing a pavement to reach cycle parking. It'd still suck if it had been a cycle track with people walking on it.The twunt in question shot straight across a busy pavement with a constant stream of pedestrians forcing my wife and I, and others, to stop to avoid being hit.
Was it a while ago or are they now teaching motorists how to jump the bollards on St Andrews Street and the gate on Sidney Street?Aaaargh, I meant to say the St Andrews Street & Drummer Street side of things![]()

- Plate readers are almost never attached to restrictions like access-only gates, red light cameras or yellow box cameras and there's tons of rage and fury any time it's suggested. Reg plates still haven't prevented tons of motorists from making loads of bad movements including killing people in hit-and-runs like earlier this week in Enfield - why would they fare any better for cycles? And would you then want to hang numbers on people walking, to deter them from tripping or bumping into others?Exactly. The problem was passing too close to pedestrians, not crossing a pavement to reach cycle parking. It'd still suck if it had been a cycle track with people walking on it.
If you care to look back at your OP, you'll notice that point 2 seemed to be solely unhappy about someone crossing a pavement a bit fast/sharp to access cycle parking and didn't explicitly mention coming close to you, unlike your points 1 and 3. Sorry for the misunderstanding.If you care to look back at my op you will see it concerns dangerous behaviour in the close vicinity of pedestrians, not simple accessing cycle parking across a pavement.
I'd still drive properly even if I didn't have reg plates and I disagree with you because I suspect the vast majority of those who currently drive properly would keep doing so. I'm disappointed if you wouldn't!If you care to look back at your OP, you'll notice that point 2 seemed to be solely unhappy about someone crossing a pavement a bit fast/sharp to access cycle parking and didn't explicitly mention coming close to you, unlike your points 1 and 3. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
l.
No, I saw it but misunderstood what it meant. As I'm sure you know, many people consider even someone cycling across a pavement with no-one else nearby still puts all walkers at risk - and they tend to turn up to consultation meetings to tell police and politiciansAh. You missed the first word "Similarly"
And my later comment that each incident put me at risk.


Was it a while ago or are they now teaching motorists how to jump the bollards on St Andrews Street and the gate on Sidney Street?![]()
