Bigger thighs are better

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

ColinJ

Puzzle game procrastinator!
Rigid Raider said:
Hey, Colin, I've got news for yer, mate! There's some bloke riding off on your bike in the background.
I wondered what you were going on about - funny, I'd never noticed that rider in the background of that photograph before.

Mr Pig said:
You're supposed to measure them in cm!
Okay, 60 cm then!

I still think this is a stupid concept. It doesn't take height into account and it doesn't specify fat/muscle content of the leg so you could have an obese dwarf/midget/height-challenged person (or whatever the PC term for extreme shortarses is these days! ;)) with massively fat legs and that would be okay?
 

Mr Pig

New Member
ColinJ said:
I still think this is a stupid concept.

Yes it is. Welcome to the wonderful world of the internet forum :0)
 

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
If you get someone to slap your thighs with the ruler hard enough, then it should leave marks and you'll be able to measure it even with a wooden ruler.
 

Sittingduck

Legendary Member
Location
Somewhere flat
14 inches...
Oh wait, it's thighs isn't it :laugh:
brb - where did I put that tape measure.

edit: don't think I want to put the cm measurement in... it's not like the others' :smile:
 

Joe24

More serious cyclist than Bonj
Location
Nottingham
58cm for me.
That will be up to 60cm soon i think.
Thats pure muscle aswell.
I only weigh a few pounds over 10 stone:wacko:
 
Top Bottom