Smokin Joe
Squire
- Location
- Bare headed cyclist, Smoker
People often forget that a bike has a fair amount of adjustment for position and the body is flexible and adaptable.
If, like me, you have a long torso but short legs for your height, then you should go for the larger size frame. It's easier to adjust the seat height than adjusting the reach to the bars.Always go for a smaller frame if you fall between two sizes.
I'm 183cm and can ride but a 58 or 56, but always buy the 56 and run a setback seat post and longer stem if required.
If, like me, you have a long torso but short legs for your height, then you should go for the larger size frame. It's easier to adjust the seat height than adjusting the reach to the bars.
My commuter is a 56 and im the same height, works with an 80 mm stem .I recently bought a used Secteur in a 56cm it does look too big for me as I am only 5'7 but it is really comfortable and it has but the pleasure back into road bikes again. If anyone was to tell me it was too big I would tell them to go away, but a little less politely, Ride what you are comfortable on is my motto these days not what fashion dictates.
My commuter is a 56 and im the same height, works with an 80 mm stem .
Yes couldn't agree more....interesting times ahead for both UK and U.S...having lived in both countries i know things will work out.Thank you, I'm hoping he'll turn out okay. Regardless of stated views and beliefs, one always wants the best for ones' country.
Depends what the purpose of the bike will be.
I have a long torso but like my seat to be a round 760mm (from BB) and bars slammed on my 56's.
When I've been on 58's, it always feels like throwing my leg over a stable door.
A smaller frame will be more responsive and lighter, all things to consider.