This is even more pointless than one of my threads.
Steady on!
This is even more pointless than one of my threads.
But it's irresistable prodding them with pointy sticks.This is one of those threads that went entirely as the OP expected.
Contrary to your somewhat foolish assertion, people really do change nationality to further their careers.
This is most curious.
As the problems you mention will never be overcome, simply because of the nature of the human animal, I'll take sport as being important now rather than waiting.Does it matter? It's all just sport, and therefore actually not actually terribly important. When everyone in the world has enough to eat and a place to live, and isn't going to be shot for happening to disagree with whoever is in power, and when the environment isn't being degraded for profit, then sport can be important.
Sport is essential to our species. It has taken place in all societies and at all times that we have records of. AFAIK it is also unique to us.It's all just sport, and therefore actually not actually terribly important.
If a cat is born in a stable?
Does that make it a horse.
Plenty of atheletes chose to change their original nationality to British to compete for Britain/England/Wales etc rather than for their country of birth so I can't understand your second assertion, and your first needs some explanation.
Ignore Noodley.
Thanks Doc, but I don't think anyone has suggested that cyclists have moved from the continent to Blighty to further their careers (although I did wonder), but judging from the IOC's Jacques Rogge he seems to think it may be occuring in other sports.
I wonder if perhaps some of these cyclists became British just to advance their sporting career.
Oh, did someone else ask this then?
Oh, it was you after all.