As a user of both, I tend to prefer Campag in its 9-speed form* as it has proved to be rugged and durable compared to Shimano and I like the solid feel of ergo changers. I have Shimano on two bikes only because it is easier to get round here but it does seem to wear very quickly. STI shifters work ok but have a kind of sneaky underhand character compared to the manly ergos.
*9 speeds are bad enough, but anything with more than 9-speeds is despicably effete, esp. with a triple as well!
Campag for me... but only just! I don't like their carbon fixation with their top end stuff and just wish they'd broaden out to do stuff like 57mm drop dual-pivots and cantilevers that work with their ergo shifters.
Their shifters are still by far the most elegant (I do like the new Centaur in alloy) but it could well be that my next bike will be Shimano because of the ability to match MTB hubs and canti's with road mechs and shifters.
Maybe because it's what I saw first, dunno, but I absolutely HATE what Campag Ergos look like, and love the STI shifters' stylings. I don't like the new DA 7900 though, they are trying to be Campag. Not good.
Of course one could thing you can say about Campag is that you can always tell them apart from Shimano by the awful racket they make when freewheeling.
I've got Veloce on my summerbike and sora on the winter based on that, which probably aint a fair comparison, I prefer Campy. Whenever I hired a road bike its had 105's and whilst it work well I think I still prefer Campag.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.