I would like to think that no cyclists are going out there wearing cams only in the hope of finding poor driving to post on youtube or send to the cops. Im sure most cyclists would be more than happy if they never had to use any of their footage, but it's an insurance policy should the worst happen.
D- for effort surely?
Here are some reasons:
Campaigning against aggressive and bad driving, and less often rewarding good driving with compliments to the company involved about their employee. Bringing consequences for the small stuff makes a big difference to future behaviour.
Educating drivers on how to drive better around cyclists.
Educating cyclists on how to ride better. To be honest, I think I've probably learnt more from my own videos about my own riding than I've taught drivers through the campaigning.
Insurance against lies and dishonesty should a collision occur. This one is not a big one for me personally.
Having blatant video cameras often stops any confrontation in its tracks, as very few people are willing to carry on being an arse when they are obviously being filmed.
Recording stuff that happens on the road is a lot of fun, you sometimes catch some cool stuff.
I assume that the only way by which a cyclist could end up being assaulted is if they choose to remonstrate with a driver who has driven inconsiderately.
Who said anything about remonstrating with drivers? I mean we all do it sometimes, but most of us would agree it's better to avoid talking to drivers at all. Sometimes that can be very hard with a driver determined to shout a lesson at you despite you doing nothing to engage with him, and that's where the camera can stop them. Sometimes it might just be about a driver noticing the camera and behaving much better around it, just as they would do around a police car.
I did!
I cant yet see why any motorist would be angry with you unless you either had a go at him first or you have done something to cause him concern.
Maybe Ive just been lucky!