Cubist
Still wavin'
- Location
- Ovver 'thill
Exactly. As in "ill-gotten gains" an adverbial form of the past tense.Rhythm Thief said:While the supposed Americanisation of our culture and language annoys me too, "gotten" is not an example of it. It doesn't mean "got"; instead, it bears the same relationship to "got" as "forgotten" does to "forgot". And "gotten" was in use in Britain long before America was invented.
English is very much an evolutionary language. Strict grammarians (and I have to admit to being a little pedantic on occasions) unfortunately run the risk of being stuck in the past, and railing against modern expression based on a set of "rules" which, unfortunately for them, are occasionally no longer valid.
The English language develops and changes over time based on external influence. It has changed from Chaucerian times for example almost beyond recognition, with Anglo-Saxon phrasing and grammar being muddled, mixed and some would say "bastardised" with Latin, Norman French, Americanism and so on.
There is however a huge difference between grammatical evolution ( esp the adoption of external phrasing and terminology) and poor or sloppy grammar. The use of "less" where "fewer" should be used, the wholly inappropriate use of apostrophes in plurals are two common examples.
The use of "of" where "have " should be used is an accident of pronunciation, and a tendency to write as one hears or speaks rather than the proper use of the conditional tense. (See also the example of people saying "At a pacific time" when they actually mean "specific")
Similarly you hear and read people using the expression "mute point" which is neither correct, nor does it make any etymological sense, where they really mean "moot", referring to an historical debating system.