Can you incriminate yourself on youtube?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Can you incriminate yourself on youtube?

Always thought you could – if so this bell end deserves it – shouldn’t be too hard to find and prosecute before he kills – just look at a few vids and you have his voice, his car type (Merc C32 AMG), video of himself jumping reds and driving at excess of 110mph on public roads (
View: http://www.youtube.com/user/YUSKHAN#p/u/8/9sI5ij0UPqE
) – is it that difficult for the police to find the url of the plonker uploading the clips??

Here’s his channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/YUSKHAN
 

gambatte

Middle of the pack...
Location
S Yorks
There was a guy a couple of years ago, vids online of him on a new motorbike doing similar. If I remember correctly they instigated the investigation and were used against him in court
 

davefb

Guru
There was a guy a couple of years ago, vids online of him on a new motorbike doing similar. If I remember correctly they instigated the investigation and were used against him in court
this guy ?
http://www.dailymail...rnet-movie.html

(apols for daily mail link)

i mean,, you would edit it to not have your own house on wouldnt you ?

[edit]
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/N...r25/mar2207youtubespeederletoff/_/R-EPI-90011
he got off though,,, 'could have been anyone' arriving at his house...
 

gaz

Cycle Camera TV
Location
South Croydon
I was told by the police that if i didn't stop swearing in my videos then i would be done for a public order offence.
 
I was told by the police that if i didn't stop swearing in my videos then i would be done for a public order offence.

So are you supposed to let the car quietly run you over :wacko:
 

gaz

Cycle Camera TV
Location
South Croydon
So are you supposed to let the car quietly run you over :wacko:
I was told that it would be ok if I was in immediate danger, but if i did so after the incident with in ear shot of other people then I would be charged for a public order offence. Which is fair enough.
 
I was told that it would be ok if I was in immediate danger, but if i did so after the incident with in ear shot of other people then I would be charged for a public order offence. Which is fair enough.

They'd bloody struggle without signs of someone near you being harassed, alarmed or distressed. Thats what they now ask for when we arrest people for Section 5 P.O. Act. No actual statement needed, just some evidence (police officer witnessing is enough) that someone appeared HAD'd. From all of your videos, I haven't seen that.

Interestingly too, being in immediate danger wouldn't technically be an offence.
 

the snail

Guru
Location
Chippenham
I was told that it would be ok if I was in immediate danger, but if i did so after the incident with in ear shot of other people then I would be charged for a public order offence. Which is fair enough.

I think that's down to some coppers that don't like cyclists with cameras, sometimes they seem to be more worried with motorists being youtubed than by motorists trying to kill you.
 
Top Bottom