It’s 2009 at the moment
It’s 2009 at the moment
It may be on the planet Mongo but it’s 2025 in North Yorkshire😉
It’s 2009 at the moment
It’s 2009 at the moment
It may be on the planet Mongo but it’s 2025 in North Yorkshire😉
I intend to do an age-in-miles ride soon. I did the metric version (69 km) last month after my 69th birthday but am keeping the 69 miler another week or two for longer daylight hours and better weather.
I hope that I can manage a minimum of one age-in-miles ride a year up until at least 80 years of age and then perhaps consider settling for somewhere between age-in-km and age-in-miles?
My father could barely even walk by the age of 60 let alone ride a bike, so I am already doing much better than him. OTOH, I came very close to dying aged 56 and spent 8 months unable to ride at all. As @Ian H posted above - being lucky with one's health has a lot to do with it.
But... it definitely beats the alternative!Don't get old - "it's a trap"
I actually decided NOT to add the extra on! I had forgotten that my route already had extra loops at the start and finish and I didn't feel like repeating either of them.I will make sure to add the extra 11 km on
I failed by a mile today, Paris-Roubaix was on but I exceeded my age by 17miles yesterday![]()
But... it definitely beats the alternative!
It is good that you're still riding your bike at that age. 2,000 miles of cycling is probably more exercise than 50+% of the population get at any age.
My dad spent his entire 83rd year in a hospital bed before dying at 84, and he was barely able to walk for the 20 years before that.