Boris Bajic
Guest
I believe the time is coming when I'll have to fork out for a new chain.
Pah! So much for fixed-gear being low-maintenance.... But I digress.
The chainring and sprocket look OK and the chain is still not in 'replace' territory on my wear gauge (the little stick that looks like a squashed tuning fork).
But... It's that age-old thing with chains not running through a derailleur.... It's got tight spots and 'floppy' spots.
Here's the question: Assuming the tight spot is as tight as I'd like it to be, how floppy can the floppy bit be?
In otherwords, when I rotate the chain so that I'm getting maximum floppiness between chainring and sprocket, what is the consensus on how much up-down travel (inches or centimetres) there should be.
I have a feeling that I'm going to need to get a new chain, but I have a medical condition that makes spending money extremely painful and emotionally distressing.
Any clever words on maximum chain floppiness?
All advice welcome.
Pah! So much for fixed-gear being low-maintenance.... But I digress.
The chainring and sprocket look OK and the chain is still not in 'replace' territory on my wear gauge (the little stick that looks like a squashed tuning fork).
But... It's that age-old thing with chains not running through a derailleur.... It's got tight spots and 'floppy' spots.
Here's the question: Assuming the tight spot is as tight as I'd like it to be, how floppy can the floppy bit be?
In otherwords, when I rotate the chain so that I'm getting maximum floppiness between chainring and sprocket, what is the consensus on how much up-down travel (inches or centimetres) there should be.
I have a feeling that I'm going to need to get a new chain, but I have a medical condition that makes spending money extremely painful and emotionally distressing.
Any clever words on maximum chain floppiness?
All advice welcome.
