Cycleops
Legendary Member
- Location
- Accra, Ghana
DfT plans for better awareness of cyclists from motorists and a promise of cheaper insurance.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46294511
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46294511
But how many % of motor claims involve drivers who are also trained cyclists compared to drivers who aren't? If it's dispropotionate, then that might suggest lower premiums would be justified.The ABI have already said that the government hasn't discussed this with them yet and can't see how it'll produce lower premiums, given that less than 0.1% of motor claims involve cyclists.
Probably. Would a refresher hurt anything, though? It's been on my round tuit list since I picked up from comments (not directed at me) by a friend who works as a cycling trainer that I'd gotten into a couple of bad habits about junctions.I've been cycling since I was 5 so I'd have to take a cycling awareness course to qualify?
But how many % of motor claims involve drivers who are also trained cyclists compared to drivers who aren't?
Congratulations - you agree with Cycling UK and others: https://www.cyclinguk.org/press-rel...ance-reacts-dft-proposals-improve-road-safetyhttps://road.cc/content/news/252229...-cycle-training-crackdown-parking-cycle-lanes
Lot of this is what may happen if it ever will but we do know what wont be happening.
No to helmets and wear hi-vis being compulsory and bike licensing and number plates also out the window so not all bad.
But sadly the rest as with most government's reviews is on the whole a wasted op to really change stuff for the better all round.