Claiming compensation from Highways — Drain Cover (gully grate) damage

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Location
Devon & Die
If the slots are diagonal they should be angled like this if you are travelling in the direction of the arrow. That way your wheel would have to turn over 90 degrees to get caught.

View attachment 789926

grate-jpg.jpg
 

Pross

Veteran
Here's the latest (non withdrawn) version

https://www.standardsforhighways.co...55d-1290-43d9-bded-2ea6a58ba334?standard=DMRB

Being devil's avocado, this bit may actually argue against your case:

3.4Grating slots shall be orientated so as not to pose a hazard to cyclists riding over them in the direction of travel.
NOTEBS EN 124:1994 [Ref 3.N]allows grating slots parallel to the kerb which can present a serious hazard to cyclists.

One thing to note is that those standards are for motorways and trunk roads (although local highway authorities often 'adopt' them or use them as the basis for their own standards). Hampshire's own technical guidance note for drainage can be found here with gully gratings being covered on TG8-1 page 21. This bit is quite interesting "Pedestrian/cycle-friendly mesh gratings (D400 Group 4) shall be used in urban areas including any cycleway or designated cycle route. " (my bold). That reads to me like all gratings in urban areas should be mesh type rather than just those in pedestrian or cycle areas (I'm not sure if that's what they intended). However, their answer to that would probably be that is their policy for new works and doesn't apply to areas that predate the policy.
 
Last edited:

annedonnelly

Girl from the North Country
Location
Canonbie
If I see a bad pothole, I'll report it, including a phrase that I am concerned it might cause a serious injury to cyclists, or similar, to put the wind up them. Usually works.

That's what I do, e.g. on a bus route I'd mention that a cyclist could fall off in front of a bus. Or if I'm reporting a problem with a pavement I'd mention that it was near a sheltered housing scheme or similar.
 

fossyant

Ride It Like You Stole It!
Location
South Manchester
That grate is the correct way round. The one outside my house is just like that and it's at the edge of my drive. I've not managed to get stuck in it in 30 years as I've turned into my drive.
 

YMFB

Well-Known Member
Here are some of the supporting images that were provided to Highways.
The overall size of the grate: 52 cm x 50 cm.
The size of centre grate 47 x 3 cm.
Note that the grate is next to a dropped kerb which makes the chances of the wheel falling into the grate higher.
The road and I assume the grate was built 35 years ago.

View attachment 789920

View attachment 789921

View attachment 789922
Thanks for providing the information. I have no personal experience of attempting to persuade a local authority to reimburse for damage to a vehicle but in my opinion you stand very little chance of redress or cost recovery from HCC. The drain looks correctly installed and is no doubt designed and manufactured to the relevant BSEN/BS standard. The slots have to be large enough to pass a given volume of run off water, they could not be narrower within the same area.

Within Hampshire is the New Forest with its huge number of cattle grids, if you were to attempt a similar manoeuvre the consequences would be far worse.

Without trying to be clever, put it down to experience and move on is my suggestion.
 
It seems that the basis of your claim should not be the type of grating, but rather that it shouldn't be in front of a dropped kerb.

Assuming the entrance has been widened, you would need to find out from the approving authority whether the conditions included relocating the drain and take it from there.

Good luck!
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
cool_hand

cool_hand

Über Member
This may or may not have any significance but I audited the gully grates in my road.
I live in a Cul-de-sac.
There are 3 grates used in the road.
The larger grate that damaged my wheel.
Then there are 2 smaller grates (45 x 45cm).
One has safety splits and the other is completely open.
However there are a couple things to note:
The width of grate’s opening is 4 cm – this makes it more difficult for the wheel to jam in the grate, there’s more leeway for tipping the angle of the wheel before it might damage the rim.
Also to note is the grates are angled at a diagonal of 45 degrees - this makes it more unlikely that your front wheel will drop into the grate.

My Cul-de-sac joins what I would call a longer connecting road, basically the same as the Cul-de-sac in width but has a higher level of traffic by its nature. All of the gully gates are smaller and feature the safety splits. This is also true of the main roads near me – it is only in the Cul-de-sac where I come across this larger more hazardous type of grate.

IMG_0077.jpg


IMG_0078.jpg
 
OP
OP
cool_hand

cool_hand

Über Member
It seems that the basis of your claim should not be the type of grating, but rather that it shouldn't be in front of a dropped kerb.

Assuming the entrance has been widened, you would need to find out from the approving authority whether the conditions included relocating the drain and take it from there.

Good luck!
This was something that I noted, that it makes the chances of the grate causing damage higher when it is against a dropped kerb. However, I did a test with the same grate against a kerb and there was still the potential for the grate to damage the rim (the kerb didn't stop the wheel falling into the grate) although your less likely to try and turn your bike around in the road if the kerb is raised.
 

steveindenmark

Legendary Member
I reported 2 potholes close to home, here in the Danish countryside. 2 week later a crew turned up and re tarmaced 2.6km of road. I thought it was overkill. 😁

The following year the TDF came past my door. Months prior to that every road for miles around that needed work was resurfaced. They still look great.

They don't mess around in Denmark.

FB_IMG_1751533594650.jpg
 

YMFB

Well-Known Member
I reported 2 potholes close to home, here in the Danish countryside. 2 week later a crew turned up and re tarmaced 2.6km of road. I thought it was overkill. 😁

The following year the TDF came past my door. Months prior to that every road for miles around that needed work was resurfaced. They still look great.

They don't mess around in Denmark.

View attachment 790071

I wonder if that’s the approach we need in S. Wiltshire, try and get the tdf as there is no sign of new asphalt to repair pot holes. In recent years they where they repair a small area but leave a small pot hole only a few feet away.
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Photo Winner
Location
Inside my skull
I reported 2 potholes close to home, here in the Danish countryside. 2 week later a crew turned up and re tarmaced 2.6km of road. I thought it was overkill. 😁

The following year the TDF came past my door. Months prior to that every road for miles around that needed work was resurfaced. They still look great.

They don't mess around in Denmark.

View attachment 790071

Did the pothole grate on your nerves?
 

lazybloke

Ginger biscuits and cheddar
Location
Leafy Surrey
Ross Kemp had a word with them.

No, he asked Chris Rea to time-travel back 100 years or so, and get a better sub-base laid when the road was originally built.

Back in reality, for 26 years I've been carefully avoiding the worst design of drains on my road, but in the last year they all got replaced with a safer version. Just a few million pot holes to fix, and then i'll be happy.
 
Top Bottom