U
User482
Guest
Have you ever watched Alan Partridge? Or seen Coogan doing stand up?
Yes. You're going to have to explain your point, because it escapes me.
Have you ever watched Alan Partridge? Or seen Coogan doing stand up?
I did read the article. I'm sure that Clarkson et al would also say that if they said anything remotely racist or sexist the joke was also abundantly clear. It's not always an excuse.
You're thinking about tea and biscuits. Or at least you are nowI'm having a slow day......I wish someone would tell me what I'm thinking, because it's all to challenging at the moment.
But coronation street is a drama, top gear is an entertainment show, completely differentPeople are dumb, soap actors who play a baddie role get abuse in the street, not everyone can or does make the distinction from something so obviously fictitious as Coronation Street for example let alone something that has been marketed as a motoring journalism show with entertaining challenges thrown in.
Like it or not, there is a rump of society that takes the pantomime character JC has created for his TV persona as a real and authoritive figure on motoring and the acceptable attitudes they can have to it and fellow road users.
Top gear has been sold over the years as a motoring review / journalism show. The 3 faces are all newspaper columnists and rooted in the journalism field, they are not perceived as actors playing a part but as themselves presenting a *pseudo* journalistic product.B
But coronation street is a drama, top gear is an entertainment show, completely different
I guess it's really bad of me to presume that if either had been a 'he' then they'd have had a different view again... Damn that invasive public construct.Btw, I know two people who have met clarkson. one found him to be more than a little intimidating, lacking in patience, abrupt but fairly quiet. She summarised by saying he is the exact opposite of the bumbling Baffoon who assumes all of life's problems can be solved with a hammer, the other was astonished at his range of reference on a few subjects and found she had a bit of a crush on him.
You only have to read his books or watch some of his non-TG tv documentaries on WW2 themes or engineering to recognise a very lively, intelligent and knowledgeable man. Unfortunately he's also cynical and lazy, and has long-since twigged that there's immense fame to be had and money to be made by pandering to the worst instincts of many of his countrymen. In his knee-jerk contempt for the po-faced, he's become indifferent to the toxic effect this has on the domestic culture, or the damage such distortions wreak on our image overseas.the other was astonished at his range of reference on a few subjects
I think we Brits are, for the most part, a decent and liberal-minded people, who believe in courtesy and fair play and take others as we find them, and whose basic philosophy could perhaps be best summarised as live and let live.
TMN territory but here goes.
If you are pro-clarkson and have signed the stupid petition how would you feel if someone assaulted you in the workplace and your boss said "Well we can't do anything because he is funny and popular and brings in loads of cash?"
(The "brings in loads of cash" was actually trotted out to me at London Metal Exchange in the mid-90's after a broker had thrown a large heavy monitor at me. I walked out. & said broker was there on the doorstep waving a wad of fifties in my face. I got my revenge a few days later.)
A little word of praise for the producers. With the camerapeople, they make a very professional team, and that team, in part, plays a significant part in making JC. And they have a right not to be pushed around because the man's tired and hungry. They're not caterers.