I have noticed in an increasing number of posters using terms such as:
- Unfortunately I don't have a helmet cam
- Regrettably the camera wasn't recording
- I need to get a helmet cam
The consensus seems to be that these are an invaluable tool in proving negligence in accidents, where others are at fault, or where the other road user brazenly lies about events, and that NOT having this type of evidence is somehow a failure on the part of the cyclist!
They have certainly been big advances in technology and the use is far more accepted.... but what does the panel think?
[Helmet Gumf]