buggi said:
Perhaps he should be held responsible, so that in future in makes tattooists think about getting parental consent before tattooing young people
Maybe. She looks in her late teens though and where do you draw the line? I'm kinda of the opinion that if you choose to get a tattoo then it's your responsibility. Everyone knows they're permanent and can go wrong. If you decide to go for it and it doesn't work out then tough, you knew the score.
A guy at work has just got a big tattoo on the top of his right arm. Of Rabbie Burns!
It's very large actually, much bigger than I thought it would be. We recon it's a mid-life crisis tattoo, the guy's about forty-five. I tried to talk him out of it. I said "Would you have wanted a tattoo of Burns on your arm twenty years ago?" He said no and I said "So what makes you sure that you'll still want this one in ten?"
He was going to get "250 years" tattooed above it as it's Burn's 250th anniversary. I said "you nugget, it's not going to be his 250th anniversary next year and you'll still have that on your arm!"
The other thing is that he got the tattooist to copy a caricature of Burns he'd seen in a newspaper and it didn't look like the usual pictures you see of Burns. It has a white mouse sitting on Burn's shoulder but unless you were told you would not know it was supposed to be Burns. What I will say though is that the guy made a superb job of it. I thought it might be a distorted mess but it's a work of art.