Creative Photography

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Location
Devon & Die
This is why "straight out of the phone" probably doesn't mean what people think it means.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...medium=&utm_source=Bluesky#Echobox=1766503436

Adding an Instagram filter is something I would now only do ironically. But is my phone increasing the contrast or making other tweaks without my knowledge? To find out, I downloaded an app with a “zero-processing” feature that claimed to take photos without any software alterations. When comparing the photos my camera takes automatically to the photos taken with this app, the results were shocking. The so-called “raw” photos that lack processing had subtle, muted colours, softer edges – a little grainy – while the processed photos were gorgeous and crisp like the inside of a marble. Why were they so different?


The answer to this, like everything else these days, is machine learning, used by virtually every major smartphone-maker to enhance the photos taken with their cameras. Professional photographers have been aware of it for years, as you can readily see on Reddit, YouTube or Facebook. On Aurora-Hunters UK, enthusiasts accuse one another of “cheating” by using phone cameras that “automatically brighten the picture”. But outside these niche circles, it’s rarely discussed. We communicate, build relationships, advertise ourselves through our pictures – and yet they are being heavily manipulated without our knowledge. I told my friend about this on a walk, showed them the two photos side by side, and on the train home they said they “couldn’t stop thinking about it”. Tech companies are making decisions on our behalf about what our photos, and therefore our lives, look like.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Location
Devon & Die
Anyway, here's a photo 'straight of my phone': was just trying a different angle on the traditional house warming photo. Didn't catch the orange glow (too much contrast), but still kinda works.

1000019816.jpg
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Location
Devon & Die
I'm surprised at the surprise.
Wait till they find out about the filters added to faces. Reference the Vanity Fair Karoline Leavitt photos.

I just don't think the average Joe has any idea how much their photos are being manipulated, given the number of "straight out of the camera" comments I see, when it's obvious they've often been psychedelic-ised to the max.

I think it's fair to say that residents of this thread probably have an above-average grasp of how photos can be 'improved'. The chewy bit is that attempt to represent, from your memory, how you perceived a scene, given that the human brain also does its own processing of raw data, in order for us to perceive visual stuff in the first place.
 
Top Bottom