This is a bit of a rant from a newbie to be honest.
I was reading something the other day about how Hull is very cycle friendly with it's 80 something miles of cycle lanes/paths/tracks. I then looked at their map and was surprised at some of their "cycle friendly" routes, and what bothered be more is how Google use these when you do a route planner.
I don't know if all councils do the same, but apparently quiet roads are cycle friendly, even if they are: unlit, national speed limit, about 2 car width in total (i.e. a squeeze) with only a ditch on either side!
Then some of their other cycle lanes appear to be more mazes than lanes: bumps, pot holes and drain covers all to be avoided, and I don't mean one or two, but whole mazes of the things. Seems they can just put down a solid white lane and perhaps some green paint and call it friendly! Then there are the shared paths: leaves, twigs and rubbish as well as a general unevenness to them!
I was reading something the other day about how Hull is very cycle friendly with it's 80 something miles of cycle lanes/paths/tracks. I then looked at their map and was surprised at some of their "cycle friendly" routes, and what bothered be more is how Google use these when you do a route planner.
I don't know if all councils do the same, but apparently quiet roads are cycle friendly, even if they are: unlit, national speed limit, about 2 car width in total (i.e. a squeeze) with only a ditch on either side!
Then some of their other cycle lanes appear to be more mazes than lanes: bumps, pot holes and drain covers all to be avoided, and I don't mean one or two, but whole mazes of the things. Seems they can just put down a solid white lane and perhaps some green paint and call it friendly! Then there are the shared paths: leaves, twigs and rubbish as well as a general unevenness to them!