Funny, when I first read the article I thought it did mention hit and run. Went back after your post to read it again, and no mention of it. Thanks Benjus for posting the google cache version -that explains it! Of course, no mention of an apology -if I was the cyclist, I'd definitely want an apology from the Mail.
However, what's even scarier is reading the comments given on the Mail article web page. It's pretty much all one way traffic -one can only hope they will be so rabidly for sternly prosecuting a motorist when they mow down a cyclist. Well, we can hope can't we?
It's going to be interesting to see how the story unravels -what really happened, where the cyclist was, how fast she was going, etc. I'm sure the truth can never interfere with a good sensational news story though.
Anyway, regardless of all of that, the most important thing is that I hope the little girl is OK.
andyfromotley said:
I'm sorry am i going mad?? Did the mail article say this was a hit and run?? Its just i read it and didnt see that anywhere in the article, although of course i may have missed it.
Please clarify...i am confused
andy