Shared use doesn't work, whether there are painted lines or not, pedestrians wandering all over the place mean that its impossible to go at much more than walking pace safely.
Sheffield university have just made some ambitious proposals to put a shared use route in place to link up the campus areas, I responded asking for proper segregation for pedestrians and cyclists.
Blimey that's high! As someone mentioned upthread, there are roads through the park but my understanding is that they are closed to motor traffic for much of the day - does this 25mph limit apply to bikes on the road bit or on the shared paths? I mean, if you put a 25mph cycle speed limit on a shared path you are just creating the conditions for a bad accident.They have a 25 mph speed limit for bikes in the park. Seems a bit high for shared use areas.
I mean - it encourages nobbers to be nobbers, not that therefore all cyclists SHOULD go up to 25mph. Obv still the nobber's fault.Blimey that's high! As someone mentioned upthread, there are roads through the park but my understanding is that they are closed to motor traffic for much of the day - does this 25mph limit apply to bikes on the road bit or on the shared paths? I mean, if you put a 25mph cycle speed limit on a shared path you are just creating the conditions for a bad accident.
Got a link to a pic? The fact that he said he had to swerve around pedestrians which led him to swerve into other pedestrians makes it sound like an ordinary shared path but a pic would help.I think a lot of people jumping to the wrong conclusion on this thread ,have a look at where the accident happened , basically a cycle lane on a road if the reports are true .
Got a link to a pic? The fact that he said he had to swerve around pedestrians which led him to swerve into other pedestrians makes it sound like an ordinary shared path but a pic would help.
I don't get the problem here. There are roads. You can cycle on the roads like cars. Sometimes the planners let cyclists ride on the pavement alongside pedestrians. It's their space. You are being allowed to do so on the understanding they have priority. You therefore cycle accordingly. Don't whine because a shared path means you can't cycle faster. Use it for what it is, a place to cycle slowly away from the cars in places you wouldn't normally be allowed. If you want to go faster, get on the roads.
It's more the posts on this site saying that shared paths are annoying as there's pedestrians everywhere and that you have to go slowly. My response is tough, it's their space that you've been allowed on and should do so with their rules.I think in Central Park the through road is closed to motor vehicles at times, at which point the pedestrians largely turn off their radar and wander everywhere. Which obviously means bicycles should slow down and be careful, if necessary. It seems this guy did not do that.
Yes, having googled a bit that's the impression I got. West Drive is one of the through roads.I think in Central Park the through road is closed to motor vehicles at times, at which point the pedestrians largely turn off their radar and wander everywhere. Which obviously means bicycles should slow down and be careful, if necessary. It seems this guy did not do that.
I agree - but this is partly down to the obviously stupid idea of putting a painted line down a path and expecting it to magically keep pedestrians/dogs/children on one side and cyclists on the other. The guy should not have been speeding but as usual the "infrastructure" (or as we shall designate it henceforth, "the paint job") is hopelessly inadequate and the thinking behind it (or as we shall designate it henceforth, "total lack of comprehension or experience behind it") is partly to blame.