Didn't want to divert the thread, but there is another issue carrying weapons in the first place
Crankarm said:Christ, do they have the death penalty in NYC? Obviously not as if he had done this in Texas he would be on death row now.
At the bottom of the page was this which is just as terrifying:
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/06/fox-news-writer-drags-cyclist.php
Will1985 said:Only in America...reading the article I had the same thought as MacB - the justice system is so racially biased over there. This particular case bears similarities to the film Falling Down where a respected person flips out.
Had that offence been committed in the UK it would have been a mandatory minimum 5 year term. Still not enough for a maniac like that.
hackbike 666 said:Having a bad day?
Aww bless.
Had that offence been committed in the UK it would have been a mandatory minimum 5 year term. Still not enough for a maniac like that.
He'd probably get nothing near that.
Tharg2007 said:technically he wasnt shot in the head, he was shot in the helmet. Just thought i would point that out. carry on.
Tharg2007 said:technically he wasnt shot in the head, he was shot in the helmet. Just thought i would point that out. carry on.
downfader said:No, he aimed the gun at a human being and fired. Where the bullet lands is irrelevant - it is the intention of harm that is relevant.
MacB said:Unless, of course, Tharg is buying into the warning shot in the helmet idea.
Tharg2007 said:technically he wasnt shot in the head, he was shot in the helmet. Just thought i would point that out. carry on.