HJ
Cycling in Scotland
- Location
- Auld Reekie
JamesAC said:The important point, as I see it, is that there is no direct evidence to the contrary.
Until someone shows beyond reasonable doubt that wearing hi-viz and helmet is likely to lead to injury or worse, then I'll carry on wearing them.
I happen to think that it should not be compulsory: I also think that if people choose not to wear such things, they should suffer the consequences, including reduced insurance pay-outs.
Evidently you haven't bothered to look for the evidence, there is plenty out there. As for insurance, there has yet to be a court case where the Insurance Company has succeeded in proving contributory negligence. Why should the victim be blamed for bad driving!