HJ
Cycling in Scotland
- Location
- Auld Reekie
JamesAC said:The important point, as I see it, is that there is no direct evidence to the contrary.
Until someone shows beyond reasonable doubt that wearing hi-viz and helmet is likely to lead to injury or worse, then I'll carry on wearing them.
I happen to think that it should not be compulsory: I also think that if people choose not to wear such things, they should suffer the consequences, including reduced insurance pay-outs.
Evidently you haven't bothered to look for the evidence, there is plenty out there. As for insurance, there has yet to be a court case where the Insurance Company has succeeded in proving contributory negligence. Why should the victim be blamed for bad driving!

less likely to catch themselves properly when they do fall and (c) much more susceptible to minor bangs on the head than adults.
less likely to catch themselves properly when they do fall and (c) much more susceptible to minor bangs on the head than adults.