Damn lies and statistics….

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

twentysix by twentyfive

Clinging on tightly
Location
Over the Hill
Statistics prove that figures can show anything.
The lack of understanding of the data collection methodology and the following misuse of the "statistics" can show anything. Properly controlled measurements (data collection) and analysis is very powerful in revealing truths. These truths may be limited by the scope of the measurements and analysis. That's where much misunderstanding and misuse comes in.
 
OP
OP
Fab Foodie

Fab Foodie

hanging-on in quiet desperation ...
Location
Kirton, Devon.
That example shows me that journalists are at least as bad at reporting numbers as the rest of us.

(I also think that a lot of people THINK they're good wiv data, because they're good at arithmetic, and/or can drive Excel. The science of statistics is often still alien to them ...)
I passed a module in statistics and experimental design and that was enough for me ro know statistics isn’t my thang!
 

Archie_tect

De Skieven Architek... aka Penfold + Horace
Location
Northumberland
My son nearly failed his Marketing Masters- though his tutor coached him in the statistical analysis for his dissertation, the other lecturer who marked it fundamentally disagreed with his assertions... proving there's absolutely no objectivity in statistics
 

winjim

Smash the cistern
I passed a module in statistics and experimental design and that was enough for me ro know statistics isn’t my thang!
If I can graph it and get a straight line, it's probably fine. If I can't then I just log transform it until I can.

Fortunately for my dissertation the disorder I'm studying is so rare and the analyte so novel that statistical analysis is all but impossible.

So guess what 'anecdata' bores, I'm using case studies. And no, correlation does not equal causation, but association can be a powerful tool even without a demonstrated causative effect...

The power of n=2. Makes your write up a bit more manageable anyway.
 

ColinJ

Puzzle game procrastinator!
My alarm bells ring when some report mentions "percentage increase" without actual numbers. It is a good way to hide a small increase in a small number.
Or to exaggerate the significance of a big increase in a small number...?

"The number of positive test results has increased by 50% in one day..."

Yes - from 2 to 3! :whistle:
 

gbb

Legendary Member
Location
Peterborough
As my grandaughter is reaching the stage in life where she starts to form her own opinions, on the threshold of 6th year (I gather it's not called that anymore ?)... I tell (suggested to) her....
Form your own opinions.
If you're listening to any advice, adverts or particually anything political, ask yourself who is paying for or backing that advice or advert ?....it will almost certainly be loaded.
Dont automatically believe what anyone tells you, do your own homework.
 
OP
OP
Fab Foodie

Fab Foodie

hanging-on in quiet desperation ...
Location
Kirton, Devon.
In my bucket chemistry world of applications (rather than proper R&D), we rarely have the resources to set-up every test that we might like (each trial is multifactorial), so we have to be smart when planning. One question I constantly stress to our newer and less experienced members is to think about exactly how you need the outcome to be (not cheating!), does the plan really tell the story, show the trend or prove/disprove your ideas? It sounds obvious, but not always!
 

newfhouse

Resolutely on topic
This was a government minister giving evidence at the Education Committee. I will happily concede that it’s unlikely to be a left/right problem (so not a political point!), more an example of a failure of education.

58CB14A3-5444-4131-A948-C715A5AF2C6B.png
 
My son nearly failed his Marketing Masters- though his tutor coached him in the statistical analysis for his dissertation, the other lecturer who marked it fundamentally disagreed with his assertions... proving there's absolutely no objectivity in statistics

Sounds he should have put another layer on his analysis and assigned priors to his assumptions, then used Bayes.
Then he could have got it wrong rigorously.

Back to the OP, though a slight detour from spurious correlations, one of my favourites is simpson's paradox
https://towardsdatascience.com/simpsons-paradox-and-interpreting-data-6a0443516765
Gets you thinking a bit ..
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom