NickNick
Well-Known Member
Yes, really. Someone committing a minor crime doesnt make the best witness when giving evidence against someone committing an offence. Sorry, I didn't invent the rules, but that is most assuredly how it is.
That's mitigation, not defence. There is no law that let's someone commit a crime, no matter how minor (in this case S4a POA) because they're upset.
As well as the impact on how reliable a witness you're perceived to be, I would guess they would also use it in their defence as "proof" that you were cycling aggressively, on the basis that someone using violent foul language is bound to be aggressive in general (not what I believe but can see many people that would believe such crap).