Actually, on a strictly commercial basis, DFDS might have a plan. Cyclists might occupy cabins but pay little for the bikes. Motorists who want a cabin pay good money on the car deck. Not entirely ideal, but not stupid if you run a ferry.
Pleeeeeease, this is not a P&L point!
Actually, on a strictly commercial basis, DFDS might have a plan. Cyclists might occupy cabins but pay little for the bikes. Motorists who want a cabin pay good money on the car deck. Not entirely ideal, but not stupid if you run a ferry.
Pleeeeeease, this is not a P&L point!
Actually, on a strictly commercial basis, DFDS might have a plan. Cyclists might occupy cabins but pay little for the bikes. Motorists who want a cabin pay good money on the car deck. Not entirely ideal, but not stupid if you run a ferry.
Pleeeeeease, this is not a P&L point!
I thought ferry companies made their money on the cabins - at least on overnight ferries. But anyhow, the only reason I can think of for the DFDS policy (apart from corporate stupidity) is that cyclists might be taking up cabin space that otherwise would be occupied by motorists, and the motorists would be deterred from travelling, and so they'd end up with unsold vehicle-carrying capacity. But it sounds pretty implausible to me.
What's a P&L point?