united4ever
Veteran
Is this inadvisable? Always get punctures on the back since that is where the weight is. Thinking 35mm on back, 32 on front. Marathon plus on a commuter. I realise they will not be very fast rolling. Any reason not to do this?
^^^^ same with me. Whatever I have in my shed, within reason. I wouldn't mix a 35 with a 23, for example, but a 28 and a 25 would be fine with me. I'm not overly fussy about the directional arrows either if I happen to have overlooked it when I put the tyre on. I don't travel fast enough for it to make a difference these days.
Is this inadvisable? Always get punctures on the back since that is where the weight is. Thinking 35mm on back, 32 on front. Marathon plus on a commuter. I realise they will not be very fast rolling. Any reason not to do this?
Think this tyre choice is for the OP's new (to them) Boardman. Stick with the (scarcely ridden) Vittorias till they wear out, I would.Marathon plus are nearly puncture proof, so if you're getting lots it suggests something is amiss, perhaps a sharp left in the carcass, or protruding spoke, low tyre pressure etc??
My wife’s Specialised mountain bike came, from new, with a slightly wider tyre on the front to the on the rear.
Guess it depends which part of your anatomy is the limiting 'comfort' factor. Why not 28mm on both, on your 'road bike'? The width of the rear tyre adds minimal drag whereas there is a correlation between front tyre width (on a suitable rim) and drag, not that it is an issue for the OP.I've also used 28mm front 25mm back, for a bit more front comfort on my road bike.
Why not 28mm on both, on your 'road bike'?
Think this tyre choice is for the OP's new (to them) Boardman. Stick with the (scarcely ridden) Vittorias till they wear out, I would.
Vittoria's Zafiras are ok. See the chart here:Vittoria's Zafiras