What was he doing wrong? Let me think now. How about...
1) Breaking the law.
2) Doing it in public with no attempt at modesty or concealment.
3) Doing it in front of law abiding citizens who see and smell it, which is not only is it a poor example to set to children (of which there were several thereabouts), but it's a bare face pith take of the rule of law and societal decency to do so, and as a recently retired copper I find that doubly offensive.
Moral high ground didn't come into it - as aforementioned, I told him I couldn't care less what he did at home.
I missed the bit where I threatened to kick his head in - perhaps you could stick to commenting upon that which I actually did say, which was words to the effect of "if you don't put that out right this second I'll shove it so far up your arriss you'll be farting herbal love puffs for the rest of your life". I could see him pause for the moment as he considered alternative courses of action other than immediate compliance, and then he did indeed stub it out.
I was actually hoping he'd thump me - a little pipsqueak like that wasn't going to do any damage, and it would've doubled the trouble he was in if I'd summoned the dibble.
You accuse me of occupying the moral high ground, which seeing as he was breaking the law and I was not I would have been quite comfortable occupying, while simultaneously attributing words to me which I did not speak - how does that work?
Please explain.
If people want to break the law, fine. They can smoke dope, drink moonshine, sacrifice virgins to Lucifer in the privacy of their own home and I really couldn't care less. I'm not naive enough to think I can change the whole World, However, do not expect me to stand by and say nothing when someone is openly, blatantly, almost casually breaking the law in public within 3 metres of me. And why should I say nothing?