I'm fast becoming a more 'generously proportioned' figure due to no cycling, all set to change soon.
Some people are just way over sensitive..
Are you self confessed fatties offended?
Why should we be? Not sure anybody will argue that cycling is good for fitness. I was going well and getting rid of the middle aged spread nicely until getting hospitalised over Summer. Bikes back on the agenda now, albeit only under physio guidance on a turbo trainer, but I expect to lose the extra 7-8kgs that re-appeared before Easter, plus a bit more maybe..Are you self confessed fatties offended?
Me and one of my cycling colleagues often observe how rediculously fat we'd be if we didn't ride. As it is we're just pleasantly plump.Do more miles, eat more pies.
That's my motto.
Me and one of my cycling colleagues often observe how rediculously fat we'd be if we didn't ride. As it is we're just pleasantly plump.
Doesn't do to be too skinny, people prefer cuddling up to plump ladies.I consider myself to be under height for my weight.
Doesn't do to be too skinny, people prefer cuddling up to plump ladies.
Or is that 'laddies'?Doesn't do to be too skinny, people prefer cuddling up to plump ladies.
It was more a result of my lifetimes research. I've been skinny, I've been fat. I get more cuddle offers somewhere in the "pleasntly plump" range.Or is that 'laddies'?
It's a generalisation to say that people prefer 'plump' - some do, some don't - I don't.
I definitely don't find 'scrawny' to be attractive but I do like 'slim'. (That applies to myself too - I didn't like my body at 16+ stone, and I didn't like it below 12 stone either. At 6' 1", I feel and look at my best between 12 and 13 stone.)