1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

ffs

Discussion in 'CycleChat Cafe' started by alecstilleyedye, 1 Nov 2007.

  1. alecstilleyedye

    alecstilleyedye nothing in moderation Staff Member

    came to work in the car today (front lights BOTH gone on the bike, i've got a cold, and i'm getting some logs for the fire while i'm here).

    anyway, bemoaning the lack of my daily constitutional to a colleague, i get a load of all-cyclists-are-uninsured-rljers bollocks. and despite explaining that cars need to be insured because of the scale of damage they can do (and that many cyclists are covered by personal liability cover anyway) thay had none of it.

    no road tax mentioned though, i was hoping to give a full demolition of that argument, but sadly it was not forthcoming.

    :blush:xx(!:biggrin:

    why is it that motorists tar us all with the same brush (apparently he had a cyclist rlj on his way in)?

    how about: all motorists are 4x4 driving chavs with basball caps driving at 25mph whilst on their mobile phones? makes about as much sense doesn't it?
     
  2. Jacomus-rides-Gen

    Jacomus-rides-Gen New Member

    Location:
    Guildford / London
    As cab so brilliantly pointed out

    "his problem is that you're on a bicycle and he has a small penis"
     
  3. ChrisW

    ChrisW Senior Member

    That Cab...pure Shakespeare! :blush:
     
  4. alecstilleyedye

    alecstilleyedye nothing in moderation Staff Member

    my problem is that i was not on a bicycle :blush:
     
  5. Cab

    Cab New Member

    Location:
    Cambridge
    Then he has a very small penis.
     
  6. alecstilleyedye

    alecstilleyedye nothing in moderation Staff Member

    shall i check that out, seeing as he's sat right across from me behind 2 monitors? :blush::ohmy::ohmy:
     
  7. Tetedelacourse

    Tetedelacourse New Member

    Location:
    Rosyth
    He's either a pr1ck, or dim, or has bad patter. Either way, the problem is his.

    I don't really mind idiots tarring me with whatever brush, because at the end of the day, they're idiots and their opinion is meaningless.
     
  8. Twenty Inch

    Twenty Inch New Member

    Location:
    Behind a desk
    I had this with an otherwise rational and pleasant colleague. Her insurance argument went along the lines of: A cyclist nearly scratched my bumper when he moved across my line of travel and I didn't see him because he was behind another cyclist. Shouldn't he pay?

    She shut up pretty quickly when I pointed out that she was saying "I didn't see a cyclist and nearly hit him". Followed up by the point that of the 4800 people killed on the road every year, none of them (alright, perhaps one or two) are killed by cyclists.
     
  9. ChrisW

    ChrisW Senior Member

    Yea, we've got a guy in the office, rides a motorbike. He started complaining the other day about RLJ'ers and how it was illegal (correct).

    I then pointed out that, just POSSIBLY, he may OCCASSIONALY, exceed the 30 mph speed limit by just a little bit? And this just may be illegal as well.

    He's really quiet about cyclists now. :blush:
     
  10. wafflycat

    wafflycat New Member

    Location:
    middle of Norfolk
    I was on my bike. Waiting at a red traffic light. Behind me I hear a 'beep!' I looked round and it was a woman I know in her car. So I smailed & waved. Traffic light changed to green & I set off - she behind me & then she overtakes me a little later. I get to my destination. Woman is there. She starts talking about cycling. Goes into the full RLJ routine, how all cyclists jump red lights. So I reminded her of how she'd greeted me less than an hour earlier. Her response? "You're not all cyclists! If all cyclists were like you there wouldn't be a problem!"

    Go figure...
     
  11. Tetedelacourse

    Tetedelacourse New Member

    Location:
    Rosyth
    No figuring to be done. Idiocy, plain and simple.
     
  12. simon l& and a half

    simon l& and a half New Member

    Location:
    Streatham Hill
    my line is simple

    '...you lot kill 3500 people a year - including children on pavements, old ladies on zebra crossings, and cyclists whose only crime is to signal right in good time'. It's a generalisation, but it does work.
     
  13. NickM

    NickM Über Member

    When the last motorist ceases to use a handheld mobile phone while driving, I'll stop anticipating traffic lights' change to green when I judge that my safety is enhanced by doing so.

    Until then, fuck 'em.
     
  14. domtyler

    domtyler Über Member

    The 3,500 are only the ones directly killed in the UK through collisions. Start talking about the ones killed through pollution, wars in foreign lands in order to secure supplies for their precious petrol and so on and you move into a whole new world of death and destruction.
     
  15. ransos

    ransos Legendary Member

    Location:
    Bristol
    Yes, my standard response is "have you ever driven at 31 mph in a 30mph zone?". Usually shuts them up. As does pointing out that I do pay road tax and I'm reducing the queue they're sitting in as my car's at home.