Ah. Couldn't find a yellow face for that one?Harsh
But
Fair
Ah. Couldn't find a yellow face for that one?Harsh
But
Fair
The people taking these pictures of themselves or allowing others to do so may well be unwise but they aren't doing anything wrong. To conflate the two issues as you are is blatant victim blaming.I fail to understand the need to take naked pictures of your partner or the willingness to have them taken by your partner. It's not the same as saying 'serves you right for having your expensive bike stolen - you shouldn't have bought it.' No sensible person would leave their expensive bike unlocked and immobilised yet some women, it's nearly always female victims, willingly present unscrupulous men with the opportunity to steal their modesty, self respect and social standing.
There's a lot of education about the consequences of one's actions that needs to take place for both genders about their roles, responsibilities and possible consequences of their actions within their relationships. The internet has moved the boundaries of what damage is attainable by nasty people. Sadly society has a lot of catching up to do to curb the unsavoury activities of those who are willing and able to exploit it.
The genie has been let out of the bottle and it's going to be difficult to get it back in.
those italics are a little bit necessary, because they're the three little words Cunners was so keen to dwell uponI'm marking you down for the unnecessary italics, but that's an otherwise excellent point.
Cunobelin if you wish to discuss blackmail, start another thread. But please stop this stultifying idiocy and stop attributing things to me that I did not say.
A year or two ago, Adrian similarly replied HBF to a post of mine, and I had to resort to looking it up. Unfortunately I came first across an alternative definition, where the H stood for hand, the B for a part of the anatomy, and the F for, well, you can guess, and I spent a little while wondering just what he had in mind....Harsh
But
Fair
No, the real cycling analogy is whether suggesting using a full face motorbike helmet is blaming a cyclist with a head injury or advising that a full face motorbike helmet may prevent that injury in some but not all cases. If it's not victim blaming it's bloody useless advice.The real cycling analogy is whether suggesting using lights at night is blaming the unlit person involved in an accident or advising that lights may prevent that accident in some , but not all cases
those italics are a little bit necessary, because they're the three little words Cunners was so keen to dwell upon
you talking to yourself again cunners?
One more, and probably best if it is the last, time. No one has suggested that any level of blackmail is acceptable. This is just a ludicrous misinterpretation you introduced to deflect from the fact that you missed the point. Since then you have chosen to persist with it way beyond any point that could be considered reasonable.
Of course. She said, 'I'll make the picture public.' He said, 'Go ahead.'