BentMikey
Rider of Seolferwulf
- Location
- South London
Heh the guy on the silver scooter appears to be a fan!![]()

Heh the guy on the silver scooter appears to be a fan!![]()
I disagree. I am not a sports fanatic but I wear lycra. I am "just" a commuter; my commute is 12.5 miles each way. I do the outward journey in less than 50 minutes - average speed 15mph, even though I'm stopping at all the red lights. I arrive at work either wet from the rain or wet with sweat. In a week, I will spend between 8 and 10 hours grinding my arse on a fairly firm saddle. Padded, quick-drying lycra shorts or tights are simply the most practical and sensible things to wear under those conditions.For me lycra gives the impression the wearer is somewhat more "serious" about cycling as sport as opposed to just commuting or leisurely exercising about ... I think more accurate analogy with football would someone going to park wearing boots, shorts, shin guards, and taking special drinks or whatnot and personal trainer with them.
knowing some people owning "too many" bicycles
That sort of thing is so common on a recumbent it's all water off a duck's back now. Quite often there are 2 or 3 cameras pointed at the bike taking pictures, usually mobile phones out car windows.
Sometimes it's 6 of the blighters:
View: http://youtu.be/kI6OOUvuHzo
I didn't think AirZounding would add anything to that situation. This is a new high for me, I learnt to drive in a country where one hand on the horn and the other on the gear lever was normal behaviour.
4 way stops & single bridge cloverleafs - tributes to the politeness of (most) American drivers. Asking for a fight anywhere else.
Find it incredible to see two cyclist trying to squeeze between you and the standing traffic as you attempt your overtake. Not the brightest of moves in my opinion ... or is it just me?
I find it very annoying when people make comments about cyclists in lycra, lycra clad warriors etc.
Would they say the similar to someone who turns up to play tennis in all-whites? Or someone who goes for a football kickaround in the park wearing boots and shorts? I can never work out what the difference is. You wear something comfortable and practical for the physical activity you are doing.
Lycra is only practical for a specific subset of cycling: ie going fast and/or going far.
When I see a mamil in town I assume either he's all gear and no idea or intends to ride unsuitably aggressively. And I am a cyclist.
Lycra is only practical for a specific subset of cycling: ie going fast and/or going far.
When I see a mamil in town I assume either he's all gear and no idea or intends to ride unsuitably aggressively. And I am a cyclist.
I agree with 400bhp; I really don't understand this strange prejudice, though it seems to be very common.
Why are my Lycra pants practical for commuting?
which all helps with cycling 100 to 125 miles per week over 8 to 10 hours
- they are padded
- they don't crease up under my seat bones and I can go commando
- they move with my arse, so any friction is between the pants and the saddle, not the arse and the pants
What's it got to do with riding aggressively? Why does it imply I have no idea? Pure irrational prejudice.
- when they get wet, they dry very quickly so I don't have to carry spares
I can do 10 miles quite comfortably in a pair of jeans because I keep to a gentle pace. Your lycra and padding is only necessary because you don't want to slow down. Lycra implies aggressive cycling because unless you are doing real distance the only reason for it is to go fast.
That's purely rational. What would be irrational is to wear special dress-up clothes for a journey that doesn't justify them.
I don't mean to be harsh, but that does come across as rather judgemental, and irrational. Not everyone's needs and situation are the same as yours.
That's so wrong I just don't know where to start....